When it is needed
When similarity between publications, illustrations, interfaces or other creative materials requires a focused examination.
What we examine
- Texts and images
- Design mock-ups and styling elements
- Dated versions and source files
Materials to prepare
- All object versions to be compared
- Source files, if available
- Information about material dates and provenance
- Exact list of disputed fragments
Sample questions
- Which fragments or elements coincide in the objects compared?
- What are the nature and extent of the similarities and differences identified?
- Which features relate to shared source materials or a technical template?
- Is the sequence of submitted versions consistent with their metadata?
- Which questions about creation circumstances cannot be resolved from the available data?
How the work is carried out
- We record the object contents and units of comparison
- We conduct a focused comparison of relevant elements
- We distinguish observed correspondences from conclusions requiring other data
Result
A comparative report with tables of fragments and explanation of significant features.
What affects the conclusions
Similarity does not automatically prove unlawful use, authorship, creation date or ownership of an exclusive right.
Frequently asked questions
Does a matching percentage resolve the dispute?
A percentage alone does not explain the origin and significance of correspondences. A focused analysis of the selected units and context is needed.
Can a website design be compared?
Yes, using agreed elements and versions. Examination of source code and system operation is included as a separate technical part where necessary.